CAVC Case 15-0491: PTSD
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2014-11-25 · PIETSCH
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
PTSDPsychiatricBackCervicalHearing LossTinnitusAnkleArthritisRadiculopathy
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Back ConditionService ConnectionHearing Loss
Why It Was Decided This Way
In the November 2014 decision on appeal,the Board found that the evidence did not support a finding of service connection for the claims on appeal.
The Board determined that a medical examination was not necessary to satisfy the duty to assist regarding his claims for a thoracolumbar spine condition,right sciatic radiculopathy,a cervical spine condition,a right foot condition, and right ankle conditions because the Board found no credible medical or lay evidence of an in-service event.
Relying on the June 2013 VA examination, the Board denied service connection for hearing loss and tinnitus.
Duty to Assist in Obtaining Records The appellant argues that his treatment records have been obtained only from 2012 and that, because the claims file is so short,outstanding treatment records may be missing from the record and the Secretary has failed to assist him in obtaining them.
He also argues that treatment records from his service must be missing because the Board failed to acknowledge his Reserve service and because only two pages of treatment records have been associated with his claims file.
In the case of claims for disability compensation, the Secretary's duty to assist shall include obtaining [t]he claimant's service medical records and,if the claimant has furnished the Secretary information sufficient to locate such records,other relevant records pertaining to the claimant's active military,naval,or air service that are held or maintained by a governmental entity.
396,401 (1994)( [W]here the VA is on notice that records supporting an appellant's claim may exist,the VA has a duty to assist the appellant to locate and obtain these records.
The Board's determination whether VA fulfilled its duty to assist generally is a finding of fact that the Court reviews under the clearly erroneous standard of review.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Credibility|No Nexus|Duty To Assist
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →