CAVC Case 14-0751: Back
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2013-11-27 · SCHOELEN, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
BackKneeHeartDiabetesArthritisRadiculopathyErectile DysfunctionHypertension
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Service ConnectionKnee ConditionIncreased Rating
Why It Was Decided This Way
The examiner opined that the appellant's current symptoms were not related to his in-service injury.
In that decision,the Board noted that private treatment records dated October 19, 1998,indicate that x-rays were taken of the appellant's knees,but that the results of the x-rays,if done,were not of record.
5 In the November 2015 decision on appeal,the Board denied the appellant's claims for,among other things,entitlement to service connection for right and left knee disabilities.
Analysis Establishing service connection generally requires medical or,in certain circumstances, lay evidence of (1)a current disability; (2)an in-service incurrence or aggravation of a disease or injury;and (3)a nexus between the claimed in-service disease or injury and the present disability.
A finding of service connection,or no service connection,is a finding of fact reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard in 38 U.
A factual finding 'is clearly erroneous when although there is evidence to support it,the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.
The Secretary's duty to assist includes, in appropriate cases, providing a medical examination or obtaining a medical opinion when such an examination or opinion is necessary to make a decision on the claim.
Although VA need not provide a medical examination in all cases, once the Secretary undertakes the effort to provide an examination when developing a service-connection claim,he must provide an adequate one.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Credibility|No Nexus|Not Service Connected|Duty To Assist|Inadequate Exam
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →