CAVC Case 14-0225: PTSD
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2013-09-30 · SCHOELEN, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
PTSDDepressionBackCervicalKneeSleep ApneaShoulderHeadacheTDIURadiculopathy
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Back ConditionService ConnectionTDIUIncreased RatingPTSDSleep Apnea
Why It Was Decided This Way
The appellant ,through counsel,appeals a September 30,2013,Board of Veterans'Appeals (Board)decision in which the Board denied his claims for disability compensation for a disability manifested as left side pain due to a lightning strike and for a sleep disorder,to include sleep apnea,claimed as secondary to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD);entitlement to a disability rating in excess of 10%for chronic lumbosacral strain and for chronic cervical strain respectively;and entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU).
In the September 30,2013,decision on appeal,the Board denied all five claims.
In the September 2013 decision on appeal, the Board found not credible the appellant's lay statements asserting that his pain was so severe that he could not move.
Accordingly, the Board denied the appellant's rating-increase claims.
Discussion It is the Board's duty,as factfinder,to determine the credibility and weight to be given to the evidence.
The credibility of a witness can be impeached by a showing of interest,bias,inconsistent statements, or,to a certain extent,bad character.
The Court reviews credibility determinations under the clearly erroneous standard of review.
A finding of fact is clearly erroneous when the Court,after reviewing the entire evidence, is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Credibility|No Nexus|Inadequate Exam|Rating Criteria
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →