CAVC Case 13-580: Heart

CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2013-01-10 · SCHOELEN, Judge

This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Outcome
Vacated / Remanded
Decision Date
2013-01-10
Judge
SCHOELEN, Judge
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

HeartDiabetesHypertension

Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

Service Connection

Why It Was Decided This Way

5103A(a), whether the Secretary's duty to assist required VA to obtain a medical opinion (R.

Following two Board remands for additional development,including receipt of a VA medical nexus opinion,which the Board found inadequate for rating purposes (R.

The Board subsequently requested clarification from the VA medical expert, noting that the cardiologist failed to address the medical significance of the EKG findings and whether the findings reveal evidence of a heart condition.

4 In the January 10,2013,decision here on appeal,the Board denied the appellant's claim for service connection for the cause of the veteran's death.

The Board found that the Secretary satisfied the duty to assist,stating that there is no indication of any other relevant evidence in VA's possession,but not in the claims file.

Relying primarily on the medical expert's June and November 2012 opinions, the Board concluded that the competent evidence of record failed to establish that the veteran's cardiac arrest, coronary artery disease,hypertension,or diabetes mellitus,manifested during service or developed as a result of service.

[O]nce the Secretary undertakes the effort to provide an examination when developing a service-connection claim,he must provide an adequate one.

5 The Secretary's duty to assist also includes making reasonable efforts to obtain all potentially relevant records that the appellant adequately identifies and authorizes the Secretary to obtain.

Authorities Cited

Allday v. BrownArdison v. BrownAries v. PeakeBarr v. NicholsonCaluza v. BrownFletcher v. DerwinskiGilbert v. DerwinskiGolz v. ShinsekiGreen v. DerwinskiHood v. ShinsekiHyatt v. NicholsonKutscherousky v. WestLoving v. NicholsonMoore v. ShinsekiPolovick v. ShinsekiRizzo v. ShinsekiRodriguez v. PeakeSee Bowling v. PrincipiSee Frankel v. DerwinskiSee Kay v. PrincipiStefl v. NicholsonTalley v. BrownWood v. Peake

Denial Type

Credibility|No Nexus|Duty To Assist|Inadequate Exam

Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

VetAid is a free veterans claims tool, not a VA-accredited representative — it does not file anything with VA for you, and it works alongside your accredited VSO, claims agent or attorney. About VetAid