CAVC Case 13-1245: Hearing Loss
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2015-11-18 · KASOLD
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
Hearing LossTinnitusHeadacheTDIU
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Service ConnectionEffective DateReopenIncreased RatingHearing Loss
Why It Was Decided This Way
Specifically,the Board found that the October 1973 RO decision became final when the RO denied the substance of the hearing loss claim in September 2003 and the veteran failed to appeal that decision.
However,VA effective date regulations provide a special rule in certain circumstances when new and material evidence is involved.
4 VA has stated that,when new and material evidence other than service department records is received within an appeal period or prior to an appellate decision, [t]he effective date will be as though the former decision had not been rendered.
�New and material evidence received prior to the expiration of the appeal period,or prior to the appellate decision if a timely appeal has been filed (including evidence received prior to an appellate decision and referred to the agency of original jurisdiction by the Board .
Evidence is not new and material if it is either cumulative or redundant when compared to evidence already in the record.
156(b)requires VA to assess any evidence submitted during the relevant period and make a determination as to whether it constitutes new and material evidence relating to the old claim.
156(b)that new and material evidence be treated as having been filed in connection with the pending claim, the Federal Circuit explained, VA must evaluate submissions received during the relevant period and determine whether they contain new evidence relevant to a pending claim,whether or not the relevant submission might otherwise support a new claim [for increase].
Because no other communication indicating an intent to seek service connection for a headache disorder was received until his most recent request to reopen,the Board concluded that the appellant.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Not New Material
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →