CAVC Case 12-2616: PTSD
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 1969-04-01 · MOORMAN, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
PTSDDepressionAnxietyPsychiatricHeartTDIU
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Service ConnectionEffective DateReopenTDIUIncreased RatingPTSD
Why It Was Decided This Way
The appellant and, on remand,the Board determined the RO decision to be void ab initio,and the 10%was restored,effective April 1, 1969.
TDIU Prior to May 8, 2003 The appellant argues that the Board erred in assigning May 2003 as the effective date for the award of TDIU benefits based on his PTSD.
The Board's determination of the proper effective date for an award of VA benefits is a finding of fact that the Court reviews under the clearly erroneous standard of review set forth in 38 U.
A finding of material fact is clearly erroneous when the Court, after reviewing the entire evidence, is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.
With respect to any finding on an issue of material fact or law, the Board must provide an adequate statement of reasons or bases that enables a claimant to understand the precise basis for its decision and facilitates review in this Court.
The Court explained: In the context of TDIU,new evidence of unemployability related to the underlying condition submitted within one year of the assignment of an initial rating that is less than the maximum sought may constitute new and material evidence under 38 C.
80,84-85 (2008)(holding that,in certain circumstances,VA's duty to assist may include providing the veteran with a retrospective medical opinion and ordering the Board to consider whether such an opinion was necessary to evaluate the severity of the appellant.
156(b)(2013) ( New and material evidence received prior to the expiration of the appeal period,or prior to the appellate decision if a timely appeal has been filed .
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Credibility|Not New Material|Duty To Assist
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →