CAVC Case 12-2187: Back
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2012-03-21 · BARTLEY, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
BackKneeHearing LossShoulderHipHeadacheTBIHeartDiabetesRespiratory
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Service ConnectionReopenHearing Loss
Why It Was Decided This Way
The appellant's current hearing loss was less likely as not related to or caused by in-service noise exposure.
The audiologist further opined that hearing loss was less likely than not related to an in-service head injury because a postservice 1967 examination showed hearing within normal limits.
In May 2009,the Board found new and material evidence to reopen the respiratory condition claim and remanded the matter for a VA examination.
The appellant's left knee condition was less likely as not related to the in-service MVA because (1)there was no evidence of fracture in the left knee joint;(2)no documentation of injury to the knee joint was shown at the time of the accident;(3) current x-ray results showed only mild degenerative changes of patellofemoral joints in both knees, and (4)the scar on the left knee was superficial and .
The examiner diagnosed minimal degenerative arthritis of the hips,post-traumatic degenerative joint disease of the left shoulder,early degenerative joint disease of the left hand,plantar fasciitis,and mild degenerative joint disease (DJD)of the left knee and concluded that these were not related to military service.
The examiner opined that these conditions were likely not related to service because there was no documentation of the conditions during service and no documentation of post-traumatic MVA []bony injury.
Whether service connection is warranted is a finding of fact reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard set forth in 38 U.
A factual finding 'is clearly erroneous when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Credibility|No Nexus|Not New Material|Duty To Assist
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →