CAVC Case 12-0238: Depression
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2011-12-19 · PIETSCH, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
DepressionAnxietyPsychiatricGITDIU
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Service ConnectionTDIU
Why It Was Decided This Way
PIETSCH, Judge :the appellant ,appeals through counsel a December 19, 2011,Board of Veterans'Appeals (Board)decision in which the Board denied him entitlement to an initial disability rating greater than 10%for irritable bowel syndrome and denied him entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU).
The Board determined that the March 2010 VA medical examiner had not described the average daily frequency of the appellant's irritable bowel syndrome symptoms and had not provide[d]other equivalent information which would address the rating criteria for evaluating the severity of the disability.
The Board thus concluded that the March 2010 VA medical examination was inadequate because it failed to address the criteria upon which the [appellant's irritable bowel syndrome]is rated,and failed to provide information as to whether there were any changes in severity during the pendency of the appeal.
The Board found,therefore,that a new medical examination should be ordered.
The examiner opined that the appellant's current complaints of diarrhea [are] at least as likely as not related to his history of irritable bowel syndrome.
Regarding irritable bowel syndrome,the Board determined that the appellant experiences watery stools three times per day, but does not suffer from constipation,abdominal pain,or swelling.
Thus,the Board concluded,the appellant's disorder is not of the severity required for an increased disability rating.
Regarding TDIU,the Board determined that the appellant's service-connected disabilities, when considered in isolation from other factors,do not preclude [him]from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Credibility|Duty To Assist|Inadequate Exam|Rating Criteria
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →