BVA Case 10-2372: Depression

Real Board of Veterans' Appeals decision · November 7,2011 · SCHOELEN, Judge

Outcome
Vacated / Remanded
Decision Date
November 7,2011
Judge
SCHOELEN, Judge
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

DepressionBackCervicalRadiculopathy

Issues on Appeal

Back ConditionService Connection

Why It Was Decided This Way

Folk ,appeals through counsel a September 28, 2009,Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board)decision in which the Board denied his claim for entitlement to service connection for a low back disorder claimed as herniated lumbar disc disease with left leg radiculopathy.

The examiner opined that a rollover motor vehicle accident is unlikely to cause a herniation or a long term sequela unless there was a fracture at that time, and therefore the 2 appellant's current back condition is less likely than not related to his in-service accident.

The Board determined that the appellant was treated during his service for low back pain,but did not demonstrate symptoms of a herniated lumbar disc until many years after service.

The Board concluded that there is no medical nexus between the appellant's current disability and his service.

Finally,the Board found that VA made reasonable efforts to obtain relevant records and evidence.

Therefore,he argues, the Board failed to provide an adequate statement of reasons or bases for its determination that VA satisfied its duty to assist.

Duty To Assist Essentially,the appellant's argument is that the record does not contain a number of identified records that are potentially relevant to his claim,and therefore the Board should have discussed those records in rendering its decision that the Secretary adequately fulfilled his duty to assist.

The Secretary has a duty to assist the appellant in obtaining evidence necessary to substantiate his claim,including making reasonable efforts to obtain all relevant records that the appellant adequately identifies and authorizes the Secretary to obtain.

Authorities Cited

Allday v. BrownFletcher v. DerwinskiGilbert v. DerwinskiGolz v. ShinsekiHenderson v. WestHyatt v. NicholsonKutscherousky v. WestLoving v. NicholsonMaggitt v. WestMarciniak v. BrownMoore v. ShinsekiSchafrath v. DerwinskiSee Best v. PrincipiSee Caluza v. BrownSee Frankel v. DerwinskiSee Kay v. PrincipiSee Martin v. Occupational Safety Health Review CommSee Talley v. BrownShinseki v. Sanders

Denial Type

Credibility|No Nexus|Duty To Assist|Inadequate Exam

Find Similar Precedent for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →