CAVC Case 09-3181: Depression
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2009-04-30 · HAGEL, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
DepressionAnxietyPsychiatricBackCervicalKneeShoulderHipTBIRespiratory
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Back ConditionService Connection
Why It Was Decided This Way
Because the Board failed to ensure compliance with its September 2007 remand order regarding the appellant.
The appellant's claim for benefits for a neuropsychological disorder,and because the Board failed to provide an adequate statement of reasons or bases for its decision regarding his claim for benefits for a gastrointestinal disorder,the Court will vacate the portions of the April 30,2009, Board decision denying entitlement to benefits for a neuropsychological disorder and a gastrointestinal disorder and remand those claims for further 1 The Board also denied entitlement to initial disability ratings in excess of 10%for varicosities of the bilateral lower extremities.
Specifically,the Board found that these conditions were not undiagnosed illnesses under 38 C.
The appellant was not entitled to service connection for any of these conditions on a direct basis because there was no evidence of any diseases or injuries in service and no evidence of a nexus between the current diagnoses and his service.
In addition,with respect to his claim for benefits for a sinus and throat problem,the Board found that the evidence established that this condition was related to the April 2001 motor vehicle accident,not his service in the Persian Gulf.
The appellant first argues that the Board erred in adjudicating his claim for benefits for a neuropsychological disorder because it failed to ensure compliance with its September 2007 remand order,which instructed VA to provide him with a new psychiatric examination that included review of his claims file.
At that point,VA was free to adjudicate his claim based on the evidence of record,provided that the Board determined that the appellant.
However,both parties assert,and the Court agrees,that the Board erred when it failed to consider whether depression and anxiety constituted good cause under 3.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Credibility|No Nexus|Inadequate Exam
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →