CAVC Case 09-2648: Depression
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2009-04-02 · SCHOELEN, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
DepressionAnxietyPsychiatricBackKneeHearing LossTinnitusHipArthritis
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Back ConditionService ConnectionReopenKnee ConditionHearing Loss
Why It Was Decided This Way
SCHOELEN, Judge :the appellant ,appeals through counsel an April 2,2009,Board of Veterans'Appeals (Board)decision that (1)found that there exists no new and material evidence sufficient to reopen claims of service connection for a low back disability,hearing loss,and a right knee disability;(2) denied the appellant service connection for osteoarthritis of the hips,disability of the left hand,flat feet, depression,and a psychiatric disability;and (3)remanded the appellant's claims of entitlement to a disability rating in excess of 10%for residuals of a left knee meniscectomy and entitlement to a total temporary evaluation under 38 C.
Also regarding these three claims,the appellant argues that the Board failed to adequately explain why the appellant was not provided with a VA medical examination.
The appellant next argues that the Board failed to provide an adequate statement of reasons or bases in support of its decision that no new and material evidence had been submitted sufficient to reopen his claims for a low back disorder,hearing loss,and a right knee disability.
Service Connection Establishing service connection generally requires medical or,in certain circumstances,lay evidence of (1)a current disability;(2) incurrence or aggravation of a disease or injury in service; and (3)a nexus between the claimed in-service injury or disease and the current disability.
A finding of service connection is a finding of fact that the Court reviews under the clearly erroneous standard of review.
To comply with this requirement,the Board must analyze the credibility and probative value of the evidence,account for the evidence that it finds persuasive or unpersuasive,and provide the reasons for its rejection of any material evidence favorable to the claimant.
Osteoarthritis of the Hips The Board found that the first mention in the record of a disorder in the appellant's hips is dated September 1994,when the appellant was diagnosed with arthritis.
The Board noted that the appellant made lay statements concerning his disorder,but concluded that he is not competent to render a probative opinion on a medical matter,such as whether he has a current disability related to service.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Credibility|No Nexus|Not New Material|Duty To Assist
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →