CAVC Case 09-1145: Depression
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2007-06-27 · SCHOELEN, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
DepressionPsychiatricBackKneeHipAnkleEyeArthritisRadiculopathyFibromyalgia
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Service ConnectionEffective DateReopenIncreased Rating
Why It Was Decided This Way
Service-Connection Claims Establishing service connection generally requires (1)medical evidence of a current disability;(2)medical or,in certain circumstances, lay evidence of incurrence or aggravation of a disease or injury in service;and (3)medical evidence of a nexus between the claimed in-service injury or disease and the current disability.
To comply with this requirement, the Board must analyze the credibility and probative value of the evidence,account for the evidence it finds persuasive or unpersuasive,and provide the reasons for its rejection of any material evidence favorable to the claimant.
A finding of service connection is a finding of fact that this Court reviews under the clearly erroneous standard.
In August 2006,a VA examiner diagnosed the appellant with [s]evere bilateral greater trochanteric bursitis and opined that this was not related to her radiculopathy in that she has this bilaterally.
3 In its June 27, 2007,decision,the Board denied service connection for a bilateral hip disorder.
The Board found that the appellant had not established service connection on a direct basis because there was no evidence of an incurrence of a hip disorder during service or within a year of discharge from service,nor was there evidence of continuity of symptomatology of a hip disorder for several years following service.
The Board noted that the earliest evidence of a hip disorder in the record is from November 1992, over 14 years following the veteran's discharge from service.
The Board may discount favorable evidence if it finds that the evidence lacks probative value,but the Board must provide an adequate statement of reasons or bases for its rejection of any material evidence favorable to the claimant.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Credibility|No Nexus|Rating Criteria
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →