CAVC Case 09-0610: Depression
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2008-12-15 · SCHOELEN, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
DepressionBackCervicalShoulderHipAnkleSkinHeartTDIURadiculopathy
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Back ConditionService ConnectionEffective DateTDIU
Why It Was Decided This Way
ANALYSIS A Board determination of the appropriate degree of disability under the rating code is a finding of fact subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review.
A finding of fact is clearly erroneous when the Court,after reviewing the entire evidence, is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.
The Board must provide a statement of the reasons or bases for its determination,adequate to enable an appellant to understand the precise basis for the Board's decision as well as to facilitate review in this Court.
To comply with this requirement,the Board must analyze the credibility and probative value of the evidence,account for the evidence it finds persuasive or unpersuasive,and provide the reasons for its rejection of any material evidence favorable to the claimant.
rating and argued that he was entitled to a 60%disability rating from December 21,1998,the date the Board determined a higher disability rating was warranted.
An appellant must provide support for arguments raised on appeal.
at 36,1256-57),the Board concluded that the evidence fails to indicate that the veteran has more than subjective complaints of radiation of pain into the right lower extremity or that the veteran's disc disease had progressed to the point where he had little intermittent relief.
He asserts that the Board failed to provide an adequate statement of reasons or bases to explain why such a reduction is not severe under DC 5292.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Credibility|Duty To Assist
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →