CAVC Case 07-1699: PTSD
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2007-05-24 · SCHOELEN, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
SMCService ConnectionTDIUIncreased RatingDicPTSD
Why It Was Decided This Way
The appellant ,appeals a May 24,2007,Board of Veterans'Appeals (Board)decision in which the Board denied her claims for (1) entitlement to service connection for the cause of her husband's death;(2)entitlement to death pension benefits; (3)entitlement to service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), ischemic heart disease,eczema,and pneumonia,for purposes of accrued benefits;(4)a disability rating in excess of 30%for a gunshot wound (GSW) of the right arm,for purposes of accrued benefits;(5)special monthly compensation (SMC)based on the need for aid and attendance or being housebound, for purposes of accrued benefits;and (6)a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU)due to a service-connected disability,for purposes of accrued benefits.
ANALYSIS In her informal brief,the appellant asserts that the Board erred when it denied her claims for entitlement to service connection for cause of death,non-service-connected death pension benefits, accrued benefits,SMC,and TDIU.
She has appealed all of the issues that the Board denied .
For direct service connection to be awarded,there must be (1)medical evidence of a current disability;(2)medical evidence,or in certain circumstances, lay evidence,of in-service incurrence or aggravation of a disease or injury;and (3)medical evidence of a nexus between the claimed in-service disease or injury and the present disease or injury.
The Board's determination of whether a veteran's cause of death is service connected is a finding of fact reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard of review set forth in 38 U.
A factual finding 'is clearly erroneous 4 when although there is evidence to support it,the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.
The Board noted that the veteran was service connected for a GSW of the right arm at the time of his death.
The appellant does not direct the Court to any evidence in the record that indicates there is any nexus between either the veteran's service and the conditions that caused his death,or the veteran's service-connected GSW and the conditions that caused his death.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Credibility|No Nexus|Not Service Connected
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →