BVA Case 07-0764: Ptsd

Real Board of Veterans' Appeals decision · June 8, 2009 · LANCE, Judge

Outcome
Remanded / Affirmed / Vacated
Decision Date
June 8, 2009
Judge
LANCE, Judge
Service Era
Not specified

Conditions Claimed

PtsdDepressionAnxietyPsychiatricBackCervicalHearing_LossTinnitusSleep_ApneaShoulder

Issues on Appeal

Service ConnectionEffective DateReopenIncreased RatingHearing LossPtsdSleep Apnea

Why It Was Decided This Way

Initially,the Court notes that it lacks jurisdiction over the claims for a skin disorder,bilateral hearing loss,increased ratings for an undiagnosed illness manifested by joint pain and tinnitus,whether new and material evidence had been received as to a left shoulder disorder,and a dental/jaw disorder.

As to the right foot,the Board found the appellant is properly rated as 10%disabled for hallux valgus and that the calluses at the base of the right foot do not constitute distinct and separate disabilities to warrant separate ratings.

As to her left foot,the Board found that she is rated 10%disabled under DC 7819,the highest rating available under that code,for the calluses of her left foot.

On appeal,the Board found that the evidence of record reflects additional psychiatric diagnoses [but that]this evidence is not material because it does not show a clinical diagnosis of PTSD.

Therefore, the Board determined that the evidence submitted was not new and material and the claim was not reopened.

The Board found, however,that she had not filed her claim until 2004 and she could not,as a matter of law, be awarded an effective date earlier than the date of her claim for service connection.

The RO issued a rating decision denying service connection for GERD and a right shoulder condition because it found there was no nexus between either condition and her military service.

On appeal,the Board also concluded that her right shoulder and her GERD condition were not related to service.

Authorities Cited

Barringer v. PeakeBoggs v. PeakeClemons v. ShinsekiEsteban v. BrownHoward v. GoberIn Cox v. NicholsonJandreau v. NicholsonKutscherousky v. WestLendon v. NicholsonLoving v. NicholsonRobinson v. MansfieldRobinson v. ShinsekiSee Allday v. BrownSee Daye v. NicholsonSee Evans v. WestSee Frankel v. DerwinskiSee Gobber v. DerwinskiSee Kay v. PrincipiSee Rucker v. BrownSee Schafrath v. DerwinskiThun v. PeakeThun v. ShinsekiTucker v. West

Denial Type

Credibility|No Nexus|Not New Material|Duty To Assist

Find Similar Precedent for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →