CAVC Case 06-488: PTSD
CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 2005-12-30 · HAGEL, Judge
This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.
Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.
Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.
2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
| Rating | Monthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA) |
|---|---|
| 10% | $180.42 |
| 20% | $356.66 |
| 30% | $552.47 |
| 40% | $795.84 |
| 50% | $1,132.90 |
| 60% | $1,435.02 |
| 70% | $1,808.45 |
| 80% | $2,102.15 |
| 90% | $2,362.30 |
| 100% | $3,938.58 |
Conditions Claimed
PTSDDepressionAnxietyPsychiatricBackAnkleDiabetesTDIURadiculopathy
Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.
Issues on Appeal
Service ConnectionEffective DateReopenTDIUIncreased RatingPTSD
Why It Was Decided This Way
HAGEL, Judge : the appellant appeals through counsel a December 30, 2005, Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) decision in which the Board denied service connection for post- traumatic stress disorder, disability ratings in excess of 20% for peripheral neuropathy for both lower extremities, and a total disability rating based on individual unemployability.
The appellant in verifying his alleged stressors and because the Board's decision denying service connection for post- traumatic stress disorder provided an inadequate statement of its reasons or bases; because the Board failed to consider all applicable statutes and regulations concerning peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities; and because the issue of a total disability rating based on individual unemployability is inextricably intertwined with that issue, the Court will vacate the December 30, 2005, Board decision and remand all of these matters.
In particular, in January 2004 the Board found that the appellant.
The appellant had submitted new and material evidence to reopen his claim and remanded for him to provide additional information concerning his alleged stressors and for a VA psychiatric evaluation to determine whether he had a current diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder.
In July 2005 and the December 2005 Board decision, VA denied total disability based on individual unemployability, finding in July 2005 that his inability to work was caused by disabilities that were not service connected and in December 2005 that his combined service-connected disability rating did not meet the statutory requirements.
Finally, because his combined disability rating was 60%, the Board found that he did not meet the statutory requirements for a rating of total disability based on individual unemployability.
He also argues that VA failed in its duty to assist him in corroborating the stressors he alleged, in that VA did not seek additional information concerning individuals and units he identified as present during mortar attacks and other traumatic experiences during his Vietnam experience.
The appellant argues that VA provided an inadequate medical examination, in that the examiner did not consider functional loss of motion due to pain or other factors as required by DeLuca v.
Authorities Cited
Denial Type
Credibility|No Nexus|Not Service Connected|Not New Material|Duty To Assist|Inadequate Exam
Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim
VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.
Run my claim through VetAid →