CAVC Case 00-7171: Anxiety

CAVCReal U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) decision · 1999-12-23 · KRAMER, Chief Judge

This is a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims — the federal court that reviews Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions, one level above the Board. Court decisions can vacate, reverse, or affirm what the Board did.

What would this rating pay you? (2026 rates)

Official 2026 VA monthly compensation, including the 2.8% COLA increase.

per month ·  per year, tax-free

Dependent add-ons start at a 30% rating. Child-only and dependent-parent rates: see the full 2026 pay chart.

2026 base rates, all ratings (veteran alone)
RatingMonthly (2026, incl. 2.8% COLA)
10%$180.42
20%$356.66
30%$552.47
40%$795.84
50%$1,132.90
60%$1,435.02
70%$1,808.45
80%$2,102.15
90%$2,362.30
100%$3,938.58
See your full claim picture — free
Outcome
Reversed / Affirmed / Vacated / Remanded
Decision Date
1999-12-23
Judge
KRAMER, Chief Judge
Service Era
February 1943 to November 1945

Conditions Claimed

AnxietyCervicalSkinHeartRespiratoryArthritis

Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

Issues on Appeal

Service ConnectionEffective DateReopenIncreased RatingDic

Why It Was Decided This Way

In the first decision (Decision 1), the Board denied the appellant's claim for an effective date earlier than January 2, 1997, for his service-connected disorder of the larynx, including laryngeal carcinoma.

In the second decision (Decision 2), the Board found that neither the December 1985 BVA decision denying the appellant's claim for service connection for a chronic disorder of the larynx nor the Board's November 1987 decision denying his claim on reconsideration was the product of clear and unmistakable error (CUE).

In December 1985, the Board denied service connection for a chronic disability of the larynx.

The Board found that the veteran's laryngeal carcinoma was first manifested to a compensable degree many years after his separation from service and that this disability, including laryngeal carcinoma, was not shown to be causally related to a disease or injury of service origin.

The Board noted that because the veteran's condition was not one of the conditions afforded presumptive service connection in, or otherwise encompassed by, Public Law 97-37, that law was not applicable to the veteran's claim.

In July 1986, the RO determined that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen the claim.

In the two BVA decisions here on appeal, the Board found that an effective date prior to January 2, 1997, was not warranted on a direct basis, or on the basis of CUE in the 1985 or 1987 BVA decisions.

7105(b)(1), that decision becomes final and the claim may not thereafter be reopened or allowed, except upon the submission of new and material evidence.

Authorities Cited

Aguilar v. DerwinskiAllday v. BrownAllen v. PrincipiAmico v. WestBuckley v. WestBustos v. WestCollaro v. WestColvin v. DerwinskiCook v. PrincipiCrawford v. BrownCrippen v. BrownDisabled American Veterans v. GoberDrosky v. BrownDudnick v. BrownElkins v. GoberEspiritu v. DerwinskiFlash v. BrownFugo v. DerwinskiGardner v. BrownGilbert v. DerwinskiGinnis v. BrownGlover v. WestGlynn v. BrownHaines v. WestHanson v. BrownHatlestad v. DerwinskiHayre v. PrincipiHayre v. WestHazan v. GoberHensley v. West

Denial Type

Credibility|Not New Material|Duty To Assist|Cue

Find Similar Decisions for Your Claim

VetAid's analyzer maps your claim against thousands of real Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions like this one — surfacing the exact case law that supports your arguments.

Run my claim through VetAid →
Sponsored
Missing the medical evidence for your VA claim? REE Medical connects veterans with independent licensed providers for nexus letters and DBQs — $50 off through this link.

Referral disclosure: VetAid earns a referral fee if you become a paying REE Medical client through this link — it helps keep this site free. REE Medical provides paid medical evidence; it is not a law firm, VSO, or claims agent, and VetAid has not independently verified its services. VSOs and VA-accredited representatives will help you file your claim at no cost, and no one can guarantee a rating increase.

VetAid is a free veterans claims tool, not a VA-accredited representative — it does not file anything with VA for you, and it works alongside your accredited VSO, claims agent or attorney. About VetAid