Veterans facing significant obstacles with their claims, as you are with a problematic C&P examiner, have several avenues for escalated assistance beyond a standard VSO. First, you can formally request a new C&P examination by submitting a statement to the VA detailing the examiner’s errors or unprofessional conduct, citing your right to a thorough and impartial exam under *DeLuca v. Brown*. Concurrently, you or an accredited representative can request a copy of the problematic exam report via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the VA, which is often faster than relying on VBMS access. While DAV, as a VA-accredited VSO, can access VBMS, you may also seek a second opinion from a private physician whose nexus opinion could counter the C&P, referencing the requirement for "competent medical evidence" per 38 CFR 3.159. If your claim is denied, immediately file a Notice of Disagreement and consider engaging an accredited agent or attorney, as they can provide more direct, case-strategic advocacy than some overburdened VSOs; attorneys are particularly valuable at the Board of Veterans’ Appeals, where case law like *Buchanan v. Nicholson* on adequate examinations is pivotal. Your actionable next steps are: 1) Document the C&P issues in writing to the VA, 2) Secure a private medical opinion, and 3) Consult a VA-accredited attorney for a case review, especially if appealing.
*Disclaimer: This information is for educational purposes based on general VA practices and is not legal, medical, or official claims advice; consult an accredited professional for your specific situation.*
Need a deeper analysis?
Our AI analyzes your specific situation against thousands of BVA decisions.
Analyze Your Claim Free